Revel contends that this approach has resulted in a loss of depth and rigor in academic research, as scholars are pressured to produce work that is relevant to policymakers and industry leaders. He argues that the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is essential to the advancement of human understanding, and that the pressure to produce “useful” knowledge has stifled intellectual curiosity.
Revel’s central thesis is that the notion of “useful” knowledge is a myth. He contends that the vast majority of knowledge acquired through education and research serves no practical purpose, and that the emphasis on utility has led to a stifling of intellectual curiosity. According to Revel, the idea that knowledge is essential for solving real-world problems is a fallacy, and that the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is often at odds with the pursuit of practical solutions. La connaissance inutile.Jean-Francois Revel.pdf
Revel also critiques the role of the intellectual in modern society. He argues that intellectuals have become too focused on providing solutions to practical problems, rather than challenging prevailing wisdom and pushing the boundaries of human knowledge. According to Revel, the intellectual’s primary role is to question assumptions and challenge conventional wisdom, rather than to provide easy answers to complex problems. Revel contends that this approach has resulted in
Revel is also critical of the scientistic approach to knowledge, which he sees as a form of reductionism that neglects the complexity of human experience. He argues that science is limited in its ability to explain the world, and that the pursuit of scientific knowledge must be balanced with a recognition of its limitations. He contends that the vast majority of knowledge
One of Revel’s primary targets is the trend towards interdisciplinarity, which he sees as a manifestation of the utilitarian approach to knowledge. He argues that the emphasis on interdisciplinary research and collaboration has led to a fragmentation of knowledge, as scholars from different disciplines are forced to justify their work in terms of its practical applications.